Khủng hoảng ngân hàng Mỹ 2023: Cú sập 36 giờ của Silicon Valley Bank và đòn trừng phạt lãi suất Fed
Ngày 14 tháng 2 năm 2023, Forbes vinh danh Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) trong danh sách ngân hàng tốt nhất nước Mỹ. Chưa đầy một tháng sau, SVB sụp đổ trong vụ phá sản ngân hàng lớn thứ hai lịch sử. Bóc trần sai lầm lệch pha kỳ hạn trái phiếu sơ đẳng và cuộc rút tiền kỹ thuật số 42 tỷ USD chỉ trong 10 tiếng đồng hồ.
1. Trò hề xếp hạng và cú sập chớp nhoáng 36 giờ
Ngày 14 tháng 2 năm 2023, tạp chí tài chính danh tiếng thế giới Forbes công bố bảng xếp hạng thường niên “Những ngân hàng tốt nhất nước Mỹ” (America’s Best Banks). Tại vị trí thứ 20, cái tên Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) được xướng lên đầy trang trọng, ghi nhận 5 năm liên tiếp lọt vào nhóm định chế tài chính an toàn và tăng trưởng xuất sắc nhất.
Được thành lập từ năm 1983 tại Santa Clara, California, SVB là “trái tim tài chính” của Thung lũng Silicon: Hơn một nửa số công ty khởi nghiệp công nghệ được đầu tư mạo hiểm tại Mỹ đều mở tài khoản gửi tiền tại đây.
Thế nhưng, chỉ 24 ngày sau bài báo ca ngợi của Forbes, vào sáng ngày 10 tháng 3 năm 2023, Cơ quan Bảo hiểm Tiền gửi Liên bang Hoa Kỳ (FDIC) đã phải xông vào phong tỏa trụ sở chính của SVB, chính thức tuyên bố đóng cửa và tiếp quản ngân hàng.
Với khối tài sản hơn 209 tỷ USD, đây là vụ sụp đổ ngân hàng lớn thứ hai trong toàn bộ lịch sử Hoa Kỳ (chỉ đứng sau vụ sụp đổ của Washington Mutual năm 2008), kích hoạt một làn sóng hoảng loạn dây chuyền quét sạch các ngân hàng Signature Bank, First Republic Bank và buộc chính phủ Thụy Sĩ phải ép buộc UBS mua lại khẩn cấp ngân hàng 167 năm tuổi Credit Suisse.
Làm thế nào một ngân hàng lọt Top 20 nước Mỹ lại có thể bốc hơi hoàn toàn chỉ trong vòng chưa đầy 36 giờ.
2. Tử huyệt bảng cân đối kế toán: Mua trái phiếu lãi 1.5% trước cơn bão tăng lãi suất của Fed
Khác với cuộc khủng hoảng tài chính năm 2008 bắt nguồn từ các khoản nợ xấu dưới chuẩn và các sản phẩm tài chính phái sinh độc hại (CDO), nguyên nhân giết chết SVB là một sai lầm quản trị tài sản nợ - tài sản có (ALM) sơ đẳng đến mức khó tin trong sách giáo khoa tài chính: Lệch pha kỳ hạn (Duration Mismatch).
Trong giai đoạn đại dịch 2020 - 2021, chính sách bơm tiền rẻ của Cục Dự trữ Liên bang (Fed) đã kích hoạt một cơn sốt đầu tư mạo hiểm chưa từng có vào giới công nghệ. Các startup công nghệ huy động được hàng trăm tỷ USD và mang toàn bộ số tiền mặt đó gửi vào SVB:
- Tổng tiền gửi tại SVB tăng vọt thần tốc từ 60 tỷ USD vào đầu năm 2020 lên hơn 190 tỷ USD vào cuối năm 2021.
- SVB rơi vào tình trạng thừa mứa tiền mặt nhưng các startup công nghệ không có nhu cầu vay tiền (họ chỉ gửi tiền).
- Ban giám đốc SVB phải tìm nơi giải ngân số tiền gửi khổng lồ này để kiếm lợi nhuận.
Thay vì giữ tiền mặt ngắn hạn an toàn, ban lãnh đạo SVB đã đưa ra một quyết định định mệnh: Dùng hơn 80 đến 100 tỷ USD tiền gửi để mua Trái phiếu Chính phủ Mỹ dài hạn (kỳ hạn 10 đến 30 năm) và Chứng khoán đảm bảo bằng thế chấp (MBS) với mức lãi suất cố định nghèo nàn chỉ 1.5% đến 1.7%/năm.
Để tránh phải ghi nhận các biến động giá thị trường vào báo cáo tài chính hàng quý, SVB đã phân loại phần lớn số trái phiếu này vào danh mục “Giữ đến ngày đáo hạn” (Held-to-Maturity - HTM).
CƠ CHẾ BẪY LÃI SUẤT CỦA SVB
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ NGUỒN TIỀN VÀO (Tiền gửi của Startup): │
│ - Kỳ hạn: Cực kỳ ngắn hạn (Startup có thể rút tiền bất kỳ lúc nào) │
│ - Tổng tiền gửi: ~190 tỷ USD │
└───────────────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
│ Đem đi đầu tư
▼
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ TÀI SẢN MUA VÀO (Trái phiếu chính phủ dài hạn): │
│ - Kỳ hạn: Siêu dài hạn (10 - 30 năm) │
│ - Lãi suất cố định: Cực thấp (1.5% - 1.7%/năm) │
└───────────────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
│ Fed tăng lãi suất từ 0.25% lên 5.0%
▼
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ QUY LUẬT TOÁN HỌC TRÁI PHIẾU: │
│ Khi lãi suất thị trường tăng ──▶ Giá trị thị trường của trái phiếu │
│ cũ tụt dốc thảm hại ──▶ KHOẢN LỖ TRÊN GIẤY CỦA SVB VƯỢT 15 TỶ USD │
│ (Số tiền lỗ này lớn hơn TOÀN BỘ VỐN CHỦ SỞ HỮU THỰC TẾ của ngân hàng) │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Khi lạm phát tại Mỹ bùng nổ trong năm 2022, Fed đã thực hiện chu kỳ tăng lãi suất quyết liệt nhất trong 40 năm, đẩy lãi suất cơ bản từ 0.25% lên hơn 5.0%.
Theo nguyên lý định giá trái phiếu cơ bản: Khi lãi suất thị trường tăng lên 5%, những tờ trái phiếu cũ mang lãi suất 1.5% bị mất giá nghiêm trọng trên thị trường thứ cấp. Khoản lỗ chưa thực hiện của SVB phình to lên mức hơn 15 tỷ USD – một con số đủ để xóa sạch toàn bộ vốn chủ sở hữu và đẩy ngân hàng vào tình trạng phá sản kỹ thuật trên thực tế.
3. Vụ rút tiền kỹ thuật số 42 tỷ USD: Khi Twitter và WhatsApp đánh sập một định chế
Nếu các khoản tiền gửi của startup tiếp tục nằm yên trong ngân hàng, SVB vẫn có thể cầm cự chờ các tờ trái phiếu đó đáo hạn sau 10 hoặc 20 năm để thu hồi vốn gốc.
Thế nhưng, bước sang năm 2022 - 2023, “mùa đông công nghệ” ập đến: Nguồn vốn đầu tư mạo hiểm cạn kiệt, các công ty khởi nghiệp bắt đầu rút dần tiền gửi tại SVB để trang trải chi phí vận hành và trả lương nhân viên.
Để có tiền mặt trả cho khách hàng, ngày 8 tháng 3 năm 2023, SVB thông báo họ đã phải cắn răng bán tháo 21 tỷ USD trái phiếu, chịu một khoản lỗ thực tế 1.8 tỷ USD, đồng thời thông báo kế hoạch phát hành thêm cổ phiếu để huy động 2.25 tỷ USD bù đắp thanh khoản.
Thông báo này đã kích hoạt một làn sóng hoảng loạn tâm lý chưa từng có trong lịch sử ngành ngân hàng:
VÒNG LẶP SỤP ĐỔ THỜI KỲ KỸ THUẬT SỐ:
Các quỹ đầu cơ mạo hiểm (Peter Thiel's Founders Fund, Coatue, USV...)
phát hiện ra khoản lỗ vốn chủ sở hữu của SVB
│
▼
Các nhà đầu tư nhắn tin trong các nhóm WhatsApp và đăng cảnh báo lên Twitter (X)
YÊU CẦU TOÀN BỘ CÁC CÔNG TY STARTUP TRONG DANH MỤC RÚT TIỀN NGAY LẬP TỨC
│
▼
CÚ RÚT TIỀN KỶ LỤC TRÊN ỨNG DỤNG DI ĐỘNG:
Không cần xếp hàng ngoài phố, các nhà sáng lập chỉ cần vài cú chạm trên iPhone
│
▼
TRONG VÒNG 10 TIẾNG (Ngày 09/03/2023):
42 TỶ USD BỊ YÊU CẦU RÚT RA KHỎI SVB
(Tốc độ rút tiền đạt 4.2 tỷ USD/giờ, tương đương hơn 1 triệu USD mỗi giây!)
│
▼
SVB CẠN KIỆT HOÀN TOÀN THANH KHOẢN VÀ ÂM TIỀN MẶT 1 TỶ USD VÀO CUỐI NGÀY
FDIC BUỘC PHẢI CAN THIỆP PHONG TỎA VÀO SÁNG HÔM SAUHơn 85% đến 90% các khoản tiền gửi tại SVB vượt quá hạn mức bảo hiểm 250.000 USD của FDIC. Nỗi sợ hãi bị mất sạch tiền mặt trả lương đã khiến các CEO startup đồng loạt rút tiền trong cùng một khoảnh khắc.
Không một ngân hàng dự trữ phân đoạn nào trên hành tinh này có thể sống sót khi 25% tổng số tiền gửi bị rút sạch chỉ trong vòng một ngày làm việc.
4. Bốn bài học sâu sắc từ thảm họa thanh khoản thế kỷ 21
Sự sụp đổ của Silicon Valley Bank đã định nghĩa lại khái niệm về rủi ro ngân hàng trong kỷ nguyên mạng xã hội:
- Tốc độ của hiện tượng rút tiền hàng loạt (Bank Run) đã thay đổi vĩnh viễn: Trong thế kỷ 20, các cuộc rút tiền diễn ra chậm chạp khi người dân phải xếp hàng dài trước cửa chi nhánh trong giờ làm việc. Trong kỷ nguyên internet, sự lan truyền của mạng xã hội kết hợp với các ứng dụng ngân hàng trực tuyến 24/7 có thể giết chết một ngân hàng 200 tỷ USD chỉ bằng vài thông điệp trên điện thoại thông minh.
- Trái phiếu chính phủ không có rủi ro vỡ nợ, nhưng có rủi ro lãi suất cực lớn: Nhiều nhà quản lý tài chính lầm tưởng mua trái phiếu chính phủ Mỹ là “hoàn toàn không rủi ro”. Họ quên mất rằng tuy chính phủ Mỹ không bao giờ quỵt nợ, nhưng giá trị thị trường của các tờ trái phiếu dài hạn sẽ rơi tự do nếu lãi suất vĩ mô tăng vọt.
- Cái bẫy tập trung khách hàng (Concentration Risk): Việc phục vụ một tệp khách hàng duy nhất – các công ty công nghệ có mối liên hệ mật thiết và chung một nhóm nhà đầu tư mạo hiểm chỉ đạo – đã biến SVB thành một khối thuốc súng đồng nhất. Khi một người hô “cháy nhà”, toàn bộ khách hàng đều chạy theo một hướng.
- Hệ thống luôn cần những van an toàn vĩ mô: Để ngăn chặn thảm họa lan rộng sang hàng nghìn công ty khởi nghiệp và làm tê liệt hệ sinh thái đổi mới sáng tạo, Fed, Bộ Tài chính Mỹ và FDIC cuối cùng đã phải viện dẫn điều khoản ngoại lệ rủi ro hệ thống để bảo đảm thanh toán 100% toàn bộ tiền gửi cho khách hàng, chứng minh rằng sự ổn định tài chính luôn phải được đánh đổi bằng sự can thiệp của nhà nước.
📜 Xem toàn bộ transcript gốc tiếng Anh (4,031 từ)
Văn bản phụ đề nguyên bản tiếng Anh trích xuất trực tiếp từ video của ColdFusion phục vụ tra cứu và đối chiếu:
hi welcome to another episode of Cold Fusion this is Forbes Magazine on the 14th of February 2023 the title of this particular article reads America's best banks an entity by the name of Silicon Valley Bank was ranked number 20 and has been on the list for five years in a row founded in 1983 svb was the 16th largest bank in the United States and had over 209 billion dollars in assets yet in a few short weeks the bank would go up in Flames over the course of a couple of days Valley Banks collapse set off a Panic not seen since the days of the financial meltdown of 2008. the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank is causing shock waves across the entire business world with the FDIC now in control customers can access up to 250 thousand dollars on Monday but as ABC's Jaclyn Lee explains that's not enough for many companies left struggling to manage their finances this weekend clients of Silicon Valley Bank are scrambling and imploring the federal government to step in to help recover uninsured deposits over 250 thousand dollars it's the largest bank failure since the financial crisis of 2008. the crash created a Cascade of events some smaller Regional Banks lost the majority of their valuation and another has since collapsed companies such as roadblocks VOX media and a whole host of Silicon Valley startups are scrambling to find the cash to pay their employees meanwhile the UK government is at work trying to minimize the effects of the crash and at the same time the rest of the economy is trying to figure out what the long-term consequences of This Disaster may be this is the largest bank failure since 2008 and the second largest in history but how did a bank go from making the list of the best banks to bankrupt in less than a month what happens next is this the start of another financial crisis maybe not but there are some risks what everyone seems to have missed in this story is that it's more of a cautionary tale of mismanagement incompetent and political lobbying the bank's parent company its CEO and CFO are all being sued for fraud and the CEO lobbied Congress to remove the very laws that would have prevented this crash in the first place this whole thing is a crazy story so let's get into it [Music] you are watching cold fusion TV [Music] to understand the consequences of this crash we need to know how it started Silicon Valley Bank or svb was no ordinary Bank it was the go-to institution for venture capital and Tech startups the bank enjoyed a healthy period of growth during the 2020 pandemic low interest rates and excessive money printing from the U.S federal reserve caused the tech sector to Boom money was easy and investors were generous at the time startups were able to raise money easily due to cheap credit once the companies got that money they needed somewhere to store it this is where Silicon Valley Bank comes in svb was very popular among Founders in fact nearly 50 percent of all United States startups have some deposits in Silicon Valley Bank in 2021 svb saw a massive influx and deposit from around 61 billion at the end of 2019 to around 189 billion at the end of 2021. now svb wanted to make a larger profit from all of this cash that they were suddenly sitting on a safe investment would be long-term bonds these are usually seen as safer than stocks and provide a steady return here's why when interest rates are low newly issued bonds pay lower interest rates or returns making existing long-term bonds that pay higher more attractive this leads to an increase in demand for these bonds and an increase in their price so whoever's holding these long-term bonds makes money svb saw this situation and invested 80 billion dollars of their tech company deposits in long-term bonds and other securities they could then turn around and pay depositors a lower rate the difference between the higher rates from their long-term bonds and the cost of paying low rates for their deposits would be their profit this Arrangement Works particularly well even if some clients decided to withdraw sooner the bank can simply sell the bonds and get the liquidity necessary to pay back the depositor but what happens when everyone wants to withdraw their money all at once Silicon Valley Bank was about to find out as we covered in a previous episode about the 2008 crisis and its aftermath that still affects us today the post-crisis market isn't used to a high interest rate environment and higher interest rates could create risks in vulnerable areas of the financial system the risk management team of svb ignored this risk but more on this later problems for svb began brewing in late 2021 in the United States inflation began to rise usually when this happens the U.S federal reserve would increase interest rates to slow the economy and counteract the inflation but this time the U.S federal reserve stood by and did nothing for a while they told everyone that inflation was transitory this turned out to be completely wrong and when the FED realized their mistake they had to raise interest rates very quickly to make up for lost time this Whiplash in higher rates didn't allow time for the market to adjust meanwhile at svb their investing environment began to flip on its head as the interest rates Rose the newly issued bonds began to pay higher interest rates and this made the older long-term bonds less attractive to investors this resulted in a decline in demand causing their prices to fall svb still owned tens of billions worth of these long-term bonds so they were a Sitting Duck for risk by the end of 2022 there were 15 billion dollars in unrealized losses from the fall in long-term bond prices now normally this isn't an issue as if svb held onto these bonds until maturity they wouldn't lose anything but this was not a normal time in a higher interest rate environment technology startups were struggling to get financing as credit began to dry up these tech companies needed to dip into their cash to fund their operations with startups being the main client for svb the deposit started to slow down falling from 189 billion at the end of 2021 to 173 billion at the end of 2022 with every large withdrawal svb had to sell some of their long-term bonds to cover the transaction for some time the bank had enough liquidity to deal with these withdrawals As Time passed the depositors continued to leave on March 8 2023 svb made a bombshell announcement they were selling off their entire liquid Bond portfolio worth over 21 billion until this point the falling bond prices were only unrealized losses that is losses only on paper but once sold svb took a 1.8 billion loss in the sale to recoup some losses management decided to raise some Capital while this seemed like a logical choice this was a grave error from management the timing could not have been worse just days before silvergate a small crypto Focus Bank failed due to a similar issue although this failure had more to do with the exposure to the overall crypto market and FTX in particular but the root cause was the same the bank had a lot of assets which had lost their value due to Rising interest rates and when withdrawals in the crypto Market began to happen they had no choice but to sell those assets each sale of the asset was at a lower price than when they bought it once the loss is powered up there was no turning back investors assumed that svb was going down the same path Fierce over insolvency issues quickly spread and this resulted in svb stock losing close to 60 percent of its value in one day as all of this unfolded many Venture Capital firms advised the founders of startups to pull their money out of svb further exacerbating the problem by the end of March 9th customers have withdrawn 42 billion dollars leaving the bank with a negative cash balance about negative 958 million the withdrawals were so heavy that it ended up crashing the bank's internal system only creating more fear depositors had a reason to panic in the United States under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or FDIC the U.S government only guarantees refunds up to 250 000 now the thing is being a technology company focused Bank 97 of svb deposits exceeded this number the value of Silicon Valley Bank shares continued to be destroyed until its trading was suspended on the morning of March 10th they tried to raise capital and failed and then by midday on March 10th the bank started to look for a company to bail them out and no one wanted to touch them nobody knew the extent of the problem so it was a risk this culminated in svb being shut down by the FDIC this all happened on March 10th less than two days after the crisis started this was a spectacular failure on the side of management they failed to adjust to a rising interest rate environment and yes the U.S federal reserve did get it wrong when they stated that inflation was only transitory but svb should have had a contingency plan just in case inflation did stick around if any of you watching work in Risk Management especially in banking I'd love to hear from you in the comments Below on what a contingency plan could have been it seems that as soon as interest rates started Rising the bank could have began to offload their long-term treasuries and exchange them for bonds yielding higher interest to minimize their losses instead it seems that they waited and sold all of their liquid long-term bonds at once after the value had already fallen as Bill Ackman States quote Silicon Valley Bank Senior Management made a basic mistake they invested short-term deposits in longer term fixed-rate assets so how could management do such a thing well the story gets a bit Wilder the more that you look as people began to dig deeper into this crash some new information painted a very worrisome picture the chief risk officer for Silicon Valley Bank hightailed and left in April of 2022 and wasn't replaced until January of 2023 this meant that the bank had no Chief risk officer for eight months this was precisely at the time when the downward feedback loop was accelerating from the higher interest rates just when the bank's portfolios needed to be rebalanced to account for higher interest rates there was no one to oversee the process in other words the bank was a plane without a pilot during a storm just shocking but it doesn't end there worse yet Silicon Valley Bank CAO was the CFO of none other than Lehman Brothers at the time of its crash and you can't help but laugh at how ridiculous this next part is the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco was in charge of supervising svb and guess he was on the board the CEO of svb Greg Becker Greg was promptly heated from the board after the crash interestingly the CEO CFO and CMO of the bank sold a combined 4.4 million dollars of company stock just weeks before svb's decline an SEC filing stated that the sale of the shares was quote automated and quote pre-planned but it remains unclear if there was some foreknowledge of the collapse further to this the bank's employee received their annual bonuses ranging from 12 000 to 140 000 only hours before the bank's official crash I can't allege implications of wrongdoing but there may be a chance that the guys at the top knew something was coming right now svb is being sued for fraud by shareholders the lawsuit states that the company failed to disclose how Rising interest rates could leave the bank particularly susceptible to a bank run a crash of svb was indeed unique a combination of rapid growth bad risk management low interest rates excessive exposure to only one market and large deposits with no FDIC Insurance have all led us to this point but is this the start of something bigger for the financial system is it a Lehman moment it may very well have been a Lehman moment for regional Banks as they have similar characteristics to svb their clients are businesses they operate in a very limited number of fields and they all have some exposure to unrealized losses in this higher interest rate environment because of this the stocks of First Bank Republic Western Alliance Bancorp and Westpac Bancorp and other Regional banks have all seen large declines some as much as 66 in a day many hedge funds have also started to short sell yeah worst week since 2020 last week John and this week is not starting out on a better note despite the fact that depositors of both Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank are going to be made whole and the FED has announced this new bank term lending facility that is going to lend to Banks an extremely favorable rates that is not helping the regional Banks this morning clearly there is still fear out there about this spreading elsewhere just take a look at the shares of First Republic down 65 percent here at the opening bell this is on top of a 33 percent loss last week a week ago this was a 122 dollar stock this morning it is trading at 28 a share that is how brutal this white powder has been John and it's elsewhere in the regional Banks as well Pac West Western Alliance the falls and the stock prices were so drastic that the trading of a slew of these Banks had to be halted okay so this next part is key right at this moment the rest of the banking system seems to be largely unaffected as one Analyst at Barclays Road quote deposit pressure is the greatest for smaller Banks including regionals Global banks have more diverse funding sources and therefore are less vulnerable to that risk that being said Bank of America does have large exposure to long-term bonds that are planned to be held to maturity though if they don't sell and actually hold these bonds to maturity this shouldn't be a problem many are comparing this situation to that of the 2008 financial crisis yet this is quite different during that time some of the largest banks in the U.S all failed simultaneously and they had much bigger issues to deal with these Banks had sizable Investments and assets that overnight became worthless the assets that are responsible for the crash of svb are not worthless in fact far from it they're backed by the US government and if held to maturity in theory they're not going to lose any value the problem for svb is that they sold all of these bonds early and realized those losses tried to raise funds to cover those losses and that triggered a panic another difference resides in the fact that the banks in 2008 had huge leverage issues in the case of Lehman Brothers for example The Leverage exceeded 30 times the underlying asset in other words a decline of three to five percent in those assets meant that Lehman Brothers was completely bankrupt and lastly the big banks have a far greater degree of diversification than Regional Banks this means that they can withstand liquidity shocks more easily as generally not every single sector gets impacted at the same time not only this but the bigger banks will probably benefit from the collapse of regional Banks depositors may move their money from Regional Banks to larger institutions and if there are more bank failures the larger Banks can simply gobble up the healthy parts for pennies on the dollar does this mean that the risk of a financial crisis is non-existent well not really while the current Financial system is very different from the one in 2008 there is still a chance that this may be the first crack in the Fabrics of the current Financial system as of December 2022 the total unrealized losses for the whole banking system was close to 620 billion if Panic spreads too much many small banks will go down as a result creating a cascading effect that would cause the rest of the economy to wobble the Federal Reserve and the financial sectors of the US government have recognized this and have come up with a solution which we'll get to shortly the industry that will feel the most pain is going to be the tech sector svb quote was the lifeblood of the tech ecosystem States rokana a congressman from California's 17th District tens of thousands of startups rely on them to pay their day-to-day operations including staff you see unlike traditional businesses many of these tech companies have negative cash flows the only way that they can pay their expenses is by raising capital after the capital has been obtained they store it and use it until the next raise if you take that stored money away very quickly many of these firms start to fail several firms aren't going to be able to pay their employees and if there's further delays and when the money is returned a huge wave of layoffs and then eventually bankruptcies will follow Etsy had to delay their seller payouts the streaming company Roku held a quarter of its cash reserves in svb Roblox rocket lab Circle Fox Media and Vimeo are among countless companies affected the CEO of Y combinator Gary tan puts it best quote this is an extinction level event for startups and will set back their Innovation by 10 years or more confidence in the finance industry has been shaken U.S banks lost a combined 100 billion and 50 billion for the valuation of European Banks on the 13th of March Joe Biden had to reassure the United States population look the bottom line is this Americans can rest assured that our banking system is safe your deposits are safe let me also assure you we will not stop at this we'll do whatever is needed the situation also spreads to the UK the bank of England was looking for ways to minimize the damage the United Kingdom also had an arm of Silicon Valley bank then on March 13th HSBC bought the stricken UK entity for a measly one pound or one US dollar and 21 cents at the height of the chaos 200 UK firms confirmed that they weren't going to be able to pay their staff on the other side of the world Chinese startups also reported issues accessing their funds svb was especially popular among Chinese biotech startups as one founder explained quote we tried everything Friday morning but it was already too late the transfer is still processing it's very crazy we didn't think this could happen for Chinese groups their ecosystem was already damaged by beijing's Tech Crackdown and covid-19 pandemic controls not to mention the rising geopolitical tensions with Washington so in all of this where were the regulators well being lobbied apparently back in 2015 svb CEO begged lawmakers to exempt banks with assets less than 250 billion from the tough supervision and regulations of the Dodd-Frank Act for those who remember my 2008 episode this act was put into place to stop another financial crisis in 2018 a bill was passed that weakened this act and Greg Becker got his wish so omarova professor of law at Cornell University who testified before the Senate against relaxing regulations for smaller Banks said that the 2018 Bill quote should not have passed and he was spot on the dust has only just started to settle Silicon Valley Bank is now under FDIC control and the FDIC has since moved svb deposits to a newly formed holding bank and named Tim mayopolis a CEO on March 12 2023 another Regional Bank Signature Bank collapsed meanwhile Signature Bank marks the third largest bank failure in U.S history seeing more possible bank failures on the horizon the Federal Reserve had to do something unprecedented they announced the creation of a bank term funding program to shore up liquidity for other at-risk Banks they're allowing the affected Banks to sell their long-term bonds and securities to the FED without a loss in another announcement on the same day the treasury Federal Reserve and FDIC stated that all depositors even the uninsured ones will be made whole without the expenditure of taxpayer money some Financial commentators have said that this is an inflationary move a lot of regional Banks who use the same style of banking as svb saw worried depositors piling up outside to get their money out the fed and U.S government had to do these drastic moves to avoid Bank runs and a Cascade of bankruptcies nobody is a fan of government-assisted bailouts but this is a tough situation as Simon Johnson an economist at MIT who previously served as the chief Economist of the IMF says quote all choices are bad choices you don't want to extend this kind of bailout to people but if you aren't doing that you face a run of really big and really hard to predict proportions [Music] this is the largest banking failure since the financial crisis if the fed's creation of the bank term funding program isn't as smooth as promised or takes too long for consequences for the companies around the us could be devastating even though I think the Federal Reserve does have some blame for the background macroeconomic situation they did need to do something further to this if the Federal Reserve reverses course and starts cutting interest rates inflation could ramp up again causing even more Havoc they're stuck between a rock and a hard place raise rights destroy the economy cut rates also destroy the economy with Silicon Valley holding 50 percent of U.S VC backed startups as customers 65 000 startups would be affected by the collapse even if the government does succeed in making each depositor whole it's a sad time for the tech sector as confidence has been shaken the nightmare of being locked out of company cash delays in paying staff and countless Administration issues we'll leave a scar in summary this is a story of rapidly changing market conditions risk management failure and lobbying but zooming out even further this is exactly the kind of risk I was talking about in my 2008 episode in the third section of that video I talked about how unhealthy this economy has been ever since the crash the post-crisis economy has been built on a scaffolding of easy money and low interest rates when these conditions reverse we'll start to see that weak scaffolding start to shake what happened here is proof right in our faces it will be the weaker and badly managed sectors of the economy that start to show at first but what happens after that is anyone's guess you should definitely watch that episode if you haven't already I think you'll get a lot out of it so this svb story is still unfolding we can only wait and see what the longer term impacts will be so that's about it for me thanks for watching if you did enjoy this take a look around on the channel there's plenty of interesting stuff on here alright my name is Togo and you have been watching cold fusion and I'll catch you again soon for the next episode cheers guys have a good one [Music] what's going on [Music] cold fusion it's new thinking